linux-kernel - Re: Can we remove the Zone

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1271588670.1389.5.camel@thorin>
Date:	Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:04:30 +0200
From:	Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>
To:	Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>
Cc:	tek-life <teklife.kernel@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: Can we remove the Zone_DMA?

On Son, 2010-04-04 at 01:07 -0400, Daniel Hazelton wrote:
> On Sunday 04 April 2010 12:21:54 am tek-life wrote:
> > I’m a newbie on the linux kernel. Now I am reading the source code of
> > Linux . I have a question in the following about ZONE_DMA. 
> > 
> > In Linux , The Memory is divided to three zone. They are ZONE_DMA
> > 、ZONE_NORMAL  and ZONE_HIGHMEM. From the book of "Undstand the Linux
> > kernel ", the ZONE_DMA has the effect that the Direct Memory Access
> > (DMA) processors for old ISA buses have a strong limitation: they are
> > able to address only the first 16 MB of RAM. SO ,we must set a zone
> > for  the DMA on ISA bus.  And I suspect that the hardware has
> > developed so quickly .And  in this days the ISA has been weeded out.

That doesn't imply that the "old" systems and hardware vanishes (even
not quickly).

> > And so ,if we not defined the ZONE_DMA, is the system be effected? And
> > why not remove ZONE_DMA from the kernel . If it cann‘t to do so，the
> > compatibility is the only reason?
> 
> While ISA is gone as a true peripheral interconnect for new systems it does, 
> actually, still live on in a lot of systems that Linux still supports. While 
> those systems, generally, are running the same kernel and userspace they were 
> a decade ago I have no doubt that somebody might find an old machine and put 
> Linux on it - just because they could.
> 
> And that also discounts the non-IBM PC machines that are out there that Linux 
> also supports. While I don't know enough about them to say for sure, I am 
> quite certain that at least some of them are still using the ISA bus.

PC-104 has an ISA bus. And it is far from dead and currently deployed
for new systems.

	Bernd
-- 
Bernd Petrovitsch                  Email : bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at
                     LUGA : http://www.luga.at

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/