linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.34rc4 NFS writeback regression (bisected): client often fails to delete things it just created

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 18 Apr 2010 20:27:19 +0100
From:	Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
To:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.34rc4 NFS writeback regression (bisected): client often fails to delete things it just created

On 18 Apr 2010, Trond Myklebust verbalised:

> On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 20:43 +0100, Nix wrote: 
>> I suspect that unlink()ing a not otherwise open file for which writeback
>> is still underway is causing the files to be sillyrenamed because
>> writeback is holding them open. If writeback is the only user, they
>> should surely not be held open: nobody cares what their contents are,
>> and a lot of code depends on rm -r of directories containing recently-
>> written-but-still-closed files succeeding.
>
> Did you test with commit b80c3cb628f0ebc241b02e38dd028969fb8026a2 (NFS:
> Ensure that writeback_single_inode() calls write_inode() when syncing)?
> That fixed the above problem on my setup.

tip-of-tree includes that commit, and it's still happening for me there.
(Just verified again.)

(The exported filesystem is coming from a box running 2.6.33 atop ext4,
in case it matters.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/