[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1271674154.1674.771.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:49:14 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add a global synchronization point for pvclock
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 12:46 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 21:48 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > After this patch is applied, I don't see a single warp in time during 5 days
> > > of execution, in any of the machines I saw them before.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Please define a cpuid bit that makes this optional. When we eventually
> > enable it in the future, it will allow a wider range of guests to enjoy it.
>
> Right, so on x86 we have:
>
> X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC, which only states that TSC is frequency
> independent, not that it doesn't stop in C states and similar fun stuff.
>
> X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, which IIRC should indicate the TSC is constant
> and synced between cores.
Fun, we also have:
X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC, which states the thing doesn't stop in C
states.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists