[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1271674273.1674.777.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:51:13 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add a global synchronization point for pvclock
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 13:49 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/19/2010 01:46 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 21:48 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> >>> After this patch is applied, I don't see a single warp in time during 5 days
> >>> of execution, in any of the machines I saw them before.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Please define a cpuid bit that makes this optional. When we eventually
> >> enable it in the future, it will allow a wider range of guests to enjoy it.
> >>
> > Right, so on x86 we have:
> >
> > X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC, which only states that TSC is frequency
> > independent, not that it doesn't stop in C states and similar fun stuff.
> >
> > X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE, which IIRC should indicate the TSC is constant
> > and synced between cores.
> >
> >
>
> Sockets and boards too? (IOW, how reliable is TSC_RELIABLE)?
Not sure, IIRC we clear that when the TSC sync test fails, eg when we
mark the tsc clocksource unusable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists