[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100418213238.2e62eac7@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:32:38 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: disallow direct reclaim page writeback
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:08:05 +1000
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
> > Maybe we need to do the background dirty writes a bit more
> > aggressive... or play with heuristics where we get an adaptive
> > timeout (say, if the file got closed by the last opener, then do a
> > shorter timeout)
>
> Realistically, I'm concerned about preventing the worst case
> behaviour from occurring - making the background writes more
> agressive without preventing writeback in LRU order simply means it
> will be harder to test the VM corner case that triggers these
> writeout patterns...
while I appreciate that the worst case should not be uber horrific...
I care a LOT about getting the normal case right... and am willing to
sacrifice the worst case for that.. (obviously not to infinity, it
needs to be bounded)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists