linux-kernel - Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 15618] New: 2.6.18->2.6.32->2.6.33 huge regression in performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:19:49 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Anton Starikov <ant.starikov@...il.com>, stable@...nel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
	bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 15618] New: 2.6.18->2.6.32->2.6.33 huge
 regression in performance

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 08:00:54PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > 
> > It would be also nice to get that change into 2.6.32 stable. That is
> > widely used on larger systems.
> 
> Looking at the changes to the files in question, it looks like it should 
> all apply cleanly to 2.6.32, so I don't see any reason not to backport 
> further back.
> 
> Somebody should double-check, though.

I have queued them all up for .33 and .32-stable kernel releases now.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/