[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1271703972.10448.5.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:06:12 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: trace-cmd: make Makefile rpm-friendly
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 20:11 +0200, John Kacur wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> > From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> >
> > Update Makefile to support rpmbuild DESTDIR usage.
>
> So, what would happen if you did
> make DESTDIR=/usr/local install ?
>
> I think you would get /usr/local/usr/local
> So, I think I would NAK this patch.
>
> I also don't believe there is anything magical about DESTDIR in a spec
> file. Essentially, prefix in this makefile is equivalent to DESTDIR, so
> you can replace DESTDIR with prefix in a spec template.
>
NAK is too strong. I was looking at what perf does, and it basically
makes prefix and DESTDIR the same.
ifndef DESTDIR
prefix = $(HOME)
endif
We could do..
ifndef DESDIR
prefix = /usr/local/bin
endif
and then, if DESTDIR is not set, it would do the right thing.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists