linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [MTD] Fix JFFS2 sync silent failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:38:44 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
Cc:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] Fix JFFS2 sync silent failure

On Sat, Apr 17 2010, Jörn Engel wrote:
> Moin David,
> 
> if I read the code correctly, JFFS2 will happily perform a NOP on
> sys_sync() again.  And this time it appears to be Jens' fault.
> 
> JFFS2 does not appear to set s_bdi anywhere.  And as of 32a88aa1,
> __sync_filesystem() will return 0 if s_bdi is not set.  As a result,
> sync_fs() is never called for jffs2 and whatever remains in the wbuf
> will not make it to the device.
> 
> The patch also adds a BUG_ON to catch this problem in any remaining or
> future offenders.  I am not sure about network filesystems, but at
> least bdev- and mtd-based ones should be caught.
> 
> Opinions?

I think that BUG_ON() would be a lot better as a printk() and fail mount
instead. There's really little point in killing the kernel for something
you could easily warn about and recover nicely.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/