[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1271729638.2078.624.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:13:58 +0800
From: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
oerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>, zhiteng.huang@...el.com,
tim.c.chen@...el.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] perf & kvm: Enhance perf to collect KVM guest
os statistics from host side
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 20:11 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> FYI, i found a few problems that need fixing:
>
> > + unsigned long ip;
> > + if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest())
>
> missing newline.
>
> > + int misc = 0;
> > + if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) {
>
> ditto.
>
> > + PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_KERNEL;
> > + } else
> > + misc |= user_mode(regs) ? PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER :
> > + PERF_RECORD_MISC_KERNEL;
>
> - unbalanced curly braces
> - missing curly brace for multi-line statement.
> - unnecessary line-break due to col80 warning from checkpatch
>
> > +extern struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *perf_guest_cbs;
> > +extern int perf_register_guest_info_callbacks(
> > + struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *);
> > +extern int perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks(
> > + struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *);
>
> - unnecessary line-break due to col80 warning from checkpatch
>
> > +static inline int perf_register_guest_info_callbacks
> > +(struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *) {return 0; }
> > +static inline int perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks
> > +(struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *) {return 0; }
>
> - invalid C: function parameter needs name even if unused
> - missing space after opening curly brace
>
> Please provide delta fixes.
Here is the fix on the top of the prior 3 patches of V5.
From: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Fix some programming style issues on the top of perf kvm
enhancement V5.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
---
diff -Nraup linux-2.6_tip0417_perfkvm/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c linux-2.6_tip0417_perfkvmstyle/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
--- linux-2.6_tip0417_perfkvm/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c 2010-04-19 09:53:59.689452915 +0800
+++ linux-2.6_tip0417_perfkvmstyle/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c 2010-04-20 10:48:18.500999849 +0800
@@ -1752,23 +1752,29 @@ void perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs(struct
unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned long ip;
+
if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest())
ip = perf_guest_cbs->get_guest_ip();
else
ip = instruction_pointer(regs);
+
return ip;
}
unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int misc = 0;
+
if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) {
- misc |= perf_guest_cbs->is_user_mode() ?
- PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_USER :
- PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_KERNEL;
- } else
- misc |= user_mode(regs) ? PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER :
- PERF_RECORD_MISC_KERNEL;
+ if (perf_guest_cbs->is_user_mode())
+ misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_USER;
+ else
+ misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_KERNEL;
+ } else if (user_mode(regs))
+ misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER;
+ else
+ misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_KERNEL;
+
if (regs->flags & PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT)
misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_EXACT;
diff -Nraup linux-2.6_tip0417_perfkvm/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c linux-2.6_tip0417_perfkvmstyle/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
--- linux-2.6_tip0417_perfkvm/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c 2010-04-19 09:53:59.691378953 +0800
+++ linux-2.6_tip0417_perfkvmstyle/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c 2010-04-20 10:11:40.507545564 +0800
@@ -3776,16 +3776,20 @@ static int kvm_is_in_guest(void)
static int kvm_is_user_mode(void)
{
int user_mode = 3;
+
if (percpu_read(current_vcpu))
user_mode = kvm_x86_ops->get_cpl(percpu_read(current_vcpu));
+
return user_mode != 0;
}
static unsigned long kvm_get_guest_ip(void)
{
unsigned long ip = 0;
+
if (percpu_read(current_vcpu))
ip = kvm_rip_read(percpu_read(current_vcpu));
+
return ip;
}
diff -Nraup linux-2.6_tip0417_perfkvm/include/linux/perf_event.h linux-2.6_tip0417_perfkvmstyle/include/linux/perf_event.h
--- linux-2.6_tip0417_perfkvm/include/linux/perf_event.h 2010-04-19 09:53:59.691378953 +0800
+++ linux-2.6_tip0417_perfkvmstyle/include/linux/perf_event.h 2010-04-20 10:08:03.531551890 +0800
@@ -941,10 +941,8 @@ static inline void perf_event_mmap(struc
}
extern struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *perf_guest_cbs;
-extern int perf_register_guest_info_callbacks(
- struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *);
-extern int perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks(
- struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *);
+extern int perf_register_guest_info_callbacks(struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *callbacks);
+extern int perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks(struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *callbacks);
extern void perf_event_comm(struct task_struct *tsk);
extern void perf_event_fork(struct task_struct *tsk);
@@ -1016,9 +1014,9 @@ static inline void
perf_bp_event(struct perf_event *event, void *data) { }
static inline int perf_register_guest_info_callbacks
-(struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *) {return 0; }
+(struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *callbacks) { return 0; }
static inline int perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks
-(struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *) {return 0; }
+(struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *callbacks) { return 0; }
static inline void perf_event_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma) { }
static inline void perf_event_comm(struct task_struct *tsk) { }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists