[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BCDA46E.9030405@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:56:14 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: Fix OOPS in crash_kernel_shrink
Vitaly Mayatskikh wrote:
> Two "echo 0 > /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_size" OOPSes kernel. Also
> content of this file is invalid after first shrink to zero: it shows 1
> instead of 0.
>
> This patch fixes it.
Hmmm, I certainly did tests for 'echo 0 > kexec_crash_size' when I
worked on this, but I didn't get any oops. Can you show me the full
oops?
But yes, the size calculation looks wrong.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec.c b/kernel/kexec.c
> index 87ebe8a..474a847 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec.c
> @@ -1134,11 +1134,9 @@ int crash_shrink_memory(unsigned long new_size)
>
> free_reserved_phys_range(end, crashk_res.end);
>
> - if (start == end) {
> - crashk_res.end = end;
> + if (start == end)
> release_resource(&crashk_res);
> - } else
> - crashk_res.end = end - 1;
> + crashk_res.end = end - 1;
>
If we do this, crashk_res.end will be ahead of crashk.start.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists