[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100420113544.b06be095.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:35:44 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"minchan.kim@...il.com" <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
"kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: error at compaction (Re: mmotm 2010-04-15-14-42 uploaded
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:14:42 +0100
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 07:01:33PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> I'll verify the theory tomorrow but it's a plausible explanation. On a
> different note, where did config options like the following come out of?
>
> CONFIG_ARCH_HWEIGHT_CFLAGS="-fcall-saved-rdi -fcall-saved-rsi -fcall-saved-rdx -fcall-saved-rcx -fcall-saved-r8 -fcall-saved-r9 -fcall-saved-r10 -fcall-saved-r11"
>
> I don't think they are a factor but I'm curious.
>
Hmm ? arch/x86/Kconfig.
config ARCH_HWEIGHT_CFLAGS
string
default "-fcall-saved-ecx -fcall-saved-edx" if X86_32
default "-fcall-saved-rdi -fcall-saved-rsi -fcall-saved-rdx -fcall-saved-rcx -fcall-saved-r8 -fcall-saved-r9 -fcall-saved-r10 -fcall-saved-r11" if X86_64
Seems to be from
patches/x86-add-optimized-popcnt-variants.patch
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists