[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100420145009.GA13376@hexapodia.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 07:50:09 -0700
From: Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: correctly wire up the newuname system call
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 05:31:02AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Before commit e28cbf22933d0c0ccaf3c4c27a1a263b41f73859 64-bit x86 had
> a private implementation of sys_uname which was just called sys_uname,
> which other architectures used for the old uname. Due to some merge
> issues with the uname refactoring patches we ended up calling the
> old uname version for both the old and new system call slots, which
> lead to the domainname filed never be set which caused failures with
^^^^^ field.
> libnss_nis.
>
> Reported-by: Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S 2010-04-19 20:21:11.919003961 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S 2010-04-19 20:21:19.902005565 -0700
> @@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ ia32_sys_call_table:
> .quad stub32_sigreturn
> .quad stub32_clone /* 120 */
> .quad sys_setdomainname
> - .quad sys_uname
> + .quad sys_newuname
Yes, that's the same patch I arrived at and fixes the issue for me.
Tested-by: Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>
Thanks,
-andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists