[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100420150522.GG19264@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:05:22 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Bob Liu <lliubbo@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] change alloc function in pcpu_alloc_pages
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:27:09AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Christoph.
>
> On 04/20/2010 02:38 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > alloc_pages_exact_node results in more confusion because it does suggest
> > that fallback to other nodes is not allowed.
>
> I can't see why alloc_pages_exact_node() exists at all. It's in the
> mainline and if you look at the difference between alloc_pages_node()
> and alloc_pages_exact_node(), it's almost silly. :-(
>
alloc_pages_exact_node() avoids a branch in a hot path that is checking for
something the caller already knows. That's the reason it exists.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists