[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100420032200.GA13131@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:22:00 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hch@....de
Subject: Re: [2.6.34 regression] utsname.domainname not set in x86_32 processes
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:21:47PM -0700, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> 2.6.34-rc4 uname(2) from a x86_32 process copies out 325 bytes rather
> than the 390 bytes that 2.6.31 copied out (and that userland expects):
Which means we're missing exactly the domainname field in new_utsname,
which differenciates it from the old utsname structure. Looks like we
end up calling the old uname sscall instead of the new one for some
reason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists