| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1271799895-21028-5-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:44:37 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/23] rcu: Fix bogus CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING in comments to reflect reality. It is CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC rather than CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, so fix it. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> --- include/linux/rcupdate.h | 15 ++++++++------- include/linux/srcu.h | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h index 07db2fe..40854c6 100644 --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h @@ -106,8 +106,8 @@ extern int debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void); /** * rcu_read_lock_held - might we be in RCU read-side critical section? * - * If CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is selected and enabled, returns nonzero iff in - * an RCU read-side critical section. In absence of CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, + * If CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is selected, returns nonzero iff in an RCU + * read-side critical section. In absence of CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC, * this assumes we are in an RCU read-side critical section unless it can * prove otherwise. * @@ -129,11 +129,12 @@ extern int rcu_read_lock_bh_held(void); /** * rcu_read_lock_sched_held - might we be in RCU-sched read-side critical section? * - * If CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is selected and enabled, returns nonzero iff in an - * RCU-sched read-side critical section. In absence of CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, - * this assumes we are in an RCU-sched read-side critical section unless it - * can prove otherwise. Note that disabling of preemption (including - * disabling irqs) counts as an RCU-sched read-side critical section. + * If CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is selected, returns nonzero iff in an + * RCU-sched read-side critical section. In absence of + * CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC, this assumes we are in an RCU-sched read-side + * critical section unless it can prove otherwise. Note that disabling + * of preemption (including disabling irqs) counts as an RCU-sched + * read-side critical section. * * Check rcu_scheduler_active to prevent false positives during boot. */ diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h index 4d5ecb2..9c01f10 100644 --- a/include/linux/srcu.h +++ b/include/linux/srcu.h @@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ long srcu_batches_completed(struct srcu_struct *sp); /** * srcu_read_lock_held - might we be in SRCU read-side critical section? * - * If CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is selected and enabled, returns nonzero iff in - * an SRCU read-side critical section. In absence of CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, + * If CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is selected, returns nonzero iff in an SRCU + * read-side critical section. In absence of CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC, * this assumes we are in an SRCU read-side critical section unless it can * prove otherwise. */ -- 1.7.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists