[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100420155122.6f2c26eb.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:51:22 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Marcelo Jimenez <mroberto@...i.cetuc.puc-rio.br>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: Suspicious compilation warning
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:27:43 -0300
Marcelo Jimenez <mroberto@...i.cetuc.puc-rio.br> wrote:
> I get this warning while compiling for ARM/SA1100:
>
> mm/sparse.c: In function '__section_nr':
> mm/sparse.c:135: warning: 'root' is used uninitialized in this function
>
> With a small patch in fs/proc/meminfo.c, I find that NR_SECTION_ROOTS
> is zero, which certainly explains the warning.
>
> # cat /proc/meminfo
> NR_SECTION_ROOTS=0
> NR_MEM_SECTIONS=32
> SECTIONS_PER_ROOT=512
> SECTIONS_SHIFT=5
> MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS=32
hm, who owns sparsemem nowadays? Nobody identifiable.
Does it make physical sense to have SECTIONS_PER_ROOT > NR_MEM_SECTIONS?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists