linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kvm: do not need hardware_disable when CPU_UP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BCEBA41.9050705@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:41:37 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: do not need hardware_disable when CPU_UP_CANCELED

On 04/17/2010 12:00 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> When CPU_UP_CANCELED, hardware_enable() has not been called at the CPU
> which is going up because raw_notifier_call_chain(CPU_ONLINE)
> has not been called for this cpu.
>    

Applied, thanks.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/