[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19407.23456.469074.256306@stoffel.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:10:08 -0400
From: "John Stoffel" <john@...ffel.org>
To: Hedi Berriche <hedi@....com>
Cc: John Stoffel <john@...ffel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Robin Holt <holt@....com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/1] init: Provide a kernel start parameter to increase
pid_max v2
>>>>> "Hedi" == Hedi Berriche <hedi@....com> writes:
Hedi> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 20:15 John Stoffel wrote:
Hedi> | >>>>> "Rik" == Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> writes:
Hedi> |
Hedi> | Rik> That is 15 kernel threads per CPU.
Hedi> |
Hedi> | Rik> Reducing the number of kernel threads sounds like a
Hedi> | Rik> useful thing to do.
Hedi> |
Hedi> | Isn't that already a project?
Hedi> Yes, thanks to Alan's probing I looked it up
Hedi> http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq.git
Hedi> but we're definitely talking long term solution vs. something
Hedi> that can ease pain now.
It seems to me that running Linux on such a large machine is such a
specialized niche, the putting in your change to the regular kernel
isn't a near term need either. And from the sounds of it, Tejun's
work has better long term potential.
But hey, I'm generally clueless, so take what I say with a grain of
salt. :]
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists