[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100421203937.GX27575@shareable.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:39:37 +0100
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Cc: Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: readahead on directories
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 09:02:43PM +0100, Jamie Lokier (jamie@...reable.org) wrote:
> > FIEMAP might not be the answer, but what part of it requires fs
> > knowledge? It's supposed to be fs-independent. I agree it's not
> > always appropriate to use, and I don't know if it would be effective
> > anyway.
>
> At least we have to know whether given fs supports such interface.
> And more complex is to know how underlying fs is organized. What is
> extent, which types can it have, where exactly information about extent
> metadata is stored, i.e. where can we find what this object is about?
Ummm... Does any of that matter?
> And how to actually populate appropriate blocks into ram to speedup
> readdir()?
Blockdev readahead() :-)
> FIEMAP (which is file mapper btw :) is useful for information gathering
> about how fs is organized, but that's all I'm afraid.
That's all you need to start fetching from the blockdev. You can't
*use* the blockdev data, but that doesn't matter for this readahead
operation, only that they are approximately the right data blocks.
- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists