linux-kernel - Re: [stable] nfsd changes for 2.6.34

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100421234108.GD23480@fieldses.org>
Date:	Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:41:09 -0400
From:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	stable@...nel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] nfsd changes for 2.6.34

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 03:50:48PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 03:30:29PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 01:03:20PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Ok, care to backport them and send them to stable@...nel.org?  They
> > > don't all apply cleanly from what I can see.
> > 
> > Huh.  I just checked out 2.6.32.10 and tried applying the patches a
> > couple different ways, and the worst I got was stuff like:
> > 
> > 	patching file net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> > 	Hunk #1 succeeded at 711 (offset 5 lines).
> > 
> > Is that enough that you don't consider them clean?
> > 
> > In any case, I'll follow up with patches generated against 2.6.32.10.
> 
> You are right, I don't know what I did wrong, sorry.  I've now queued
> all of these up for the next .32 tree, as they are already in
> .33-stable.

OK, thanks.--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/