linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] acecad: fix incorrect size parameter in usb_buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100421045936.GA4364@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date:	Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:59:36 -0700
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Edouard TISSERANT <edouard.tisserant@...adoo.fr>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acecad: fix incorrect size parameter in usb_buffer_free

Hi Axel,

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 09:07:14AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> The size allocated by usb_buffer_alloc is 8, however the size free by
> usb_buffer_free in usb_acecad_disconnect is 10.
> This patch corrects the size parameter in usb_buffer_free.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>
> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>

Will apply both patches to 'next' (while size is wrong 8 and 10 still fall
in the same bucket so there shoudl not be any adverse effects apparent
to users).

You don't actually have the hardware by any chance?

-- 
Dmitry

P.S. Your mailer line-wraps patches so they have to be edited by hand
before applying, please look into it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/