[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100421061205.GC4467@cr0.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:12:05 +0800
From: Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>
Cc: Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, trivial@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] uml: i386: Avoid redefinition of NR_syscalls
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:14:43PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>Amerigo Wang wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53:07PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> The i386 subarch happens to pull in original NR_syscalls. Maybe we can
>>> make that work for all host arch, but for now just avoid the clash by
>>> using an all-upper-case name.
>>>
>>
>> Where?
>
>Not sure if this answers your question:
>
> CC arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.o
>/data/linux-2.6/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c:13:1: warning:
>"NR_syscalls" redefined
>In file included from /data/linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd.h:3,
> from
>/data/linux-2.6/arch/um/sys-i386/shared/sysdep/syscalls.h:6,
> from /data/linux-2.6/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c:10:
>/data/linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h:349:1: warning: this is
>the location of the previous definition
>
Ah, sure. I misunderstood your purpose, please do include the warning
messages you are trying to fix in your patch description.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists