[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BCED815.90704@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:48:53 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Bob Liu <lliubbo@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] change alloc function in pcpu_alloc_pages
Hello,
On 04/20/2010 05:05 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> alloc_pages_exact_node() avoids a branch in a hot path that is checking for
> something the caller already knows. That's the reason it exists.
Yeah sure but Minchan is trying to tidy up the API by converting
alloc_pages_node() users to use alloc_pages_exact_node(), at which
point, the distinction becomes pretty useless. Wouldn't just making
alloc_pages_node() do what alloc_pages_exact_node() does now and
converting all its users be simpler? IIRC, the currently planned
transformation looks like the following.
alloc_pages() -> alloc_pages_any_node()
alloc_pages_node() -> basically gonna be obsoleted by _exact_node
alloc_pages_exact_node() -> gonna be used by most NUMA aware allocs
So, let's just make sure no one calls alloc_pages_node() w/ -1 nid,
kill alloc_pages_node() and rename alloc_pages_exact_node() to
alloc_pages_node().
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists