[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1271924997.1776.319.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:29:57 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"eranian@...il.com" <eranian@...il.com>,
"Gary.Mohr@...l.com" <Gary.Mohr@...l.com>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
arjan@...ux.intel.com,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] perf: remove __weak function
hw_perf_group_sched_in()
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 15:50 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> This patch series is to remove hw_perf_group_sched_in() first.
>
> patch 1: core, add group scheduling transactional APIs
> patch 2: x86, implement group scheduling transactional APIs
> patch 3: powerpc, implement group scheduling transactional APIs
> patch 4: sparc, implement group scheduling transactional APIs
>
> Thanks for any comment.
Don't RISC architectures deal better with word sized variables than with
u8? I thought it curious you used u8 for the flags thing instead of int
or long, but I'm not quite sure it really matters one way or the other.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists