linux-kernel - Re: What's the staging review and acceptance process?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:17:08 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What's the staging review and acceptance process?

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:49:02 -0700
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 09:25:57PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 20:45 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > That caused the huge backlog staring at
> > > me right now.
> > 
> > Which likely discouraged the new contributors who
> > submitted stuff still in that backlog.
> 
> While a series of unfortunate events did happen to cause this, do you
> have any evidence of this causing people to go away? 

Subjectively the answer is yes I think. More quantatively it was the case.
I did some measurements long ago with 2.4-ac and there was direct and
clear connection between two things and patch submission/activity levels.
One was 'cycle time' (ie time from submit->response->tree) - the other was
putting the name of the contributor in the per -ac patch summaries that
used to get mailed out.


Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/