lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100422094951.GB30532@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:49:52 +0300
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	xiaohui.xin@...el.com
Cc:	arnd@...db.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, davem@...emloft.net,
	jdike@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 2/3] Provides multiple submits and asynchronous
	notifications.

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 04:37:16PM +0800, xiaohui.xin@...el.com wrote:
> From: Xin Xiaohui <xiaohui.xin@...el.com>
> 
> The vhost-net backend now only supports synchronous send/recv
> operations. The patch provides multiple submits and asynchronous
> notifications. This is needed for zero-copy case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xin Xiaohui <xiaohui.xin@...el.com>
> ---
> 
> Michael,
> 
> >Can't vhost supply a kiocb completion callback that will handle the list?
> 
> Yes, thanks. And with it I also remove the vq->receiver finally.
> 
> Thanks
> Xiaohui

Nice progress. I commented on some minor issues below.
Thanks!

>  drivers/vhost/net.c   |  227 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/vhost/vhost.c |  115 ++++++++++++++-----------
>  drivers/vhost/vhost.h |   14 +++
>  3 files changed, 301 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> index 22d5fef..4a70f66 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> @@ -17,11 +17,13 @@
>  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>  #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
>  #include <linux/file.h>
> +#include <linux/aio.h>
>  
>  #include <linux/net.h>
>  #include <linux/if_packet.h>
>  #include <linux/if_arp.h>
>  #include <linux/if_tun.h>
> +#include <linux/mpassthru.h>
>  #include <net/sock.h>
>  
> @@ -47,6 +49,7 @@ struct vhost_net {
>  	struct vhost_dev dev;
>  	struct vhost_virtqueue vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_MAX];
>  	struct vhost_poll poll[VHOST_NET_VQ_MAX];
> +	struct kmem_cache       *cache;
>  	/* Tells us whether we are polling a socket for TX.
>  	 * We only do this when socket buffer fills up.
>  	 * Protected by tx vq lock. */
> @@ -91,11 +94,132 @@ static void tx_poll_start(struct vhost_net *net, struct socket *sock)
>  	net->tx_poll_state = VHOST_NET_POLL_STARTED;
>  }
>  
> +struct kiocb *notify_dequeue(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> +{
> +	struct kiocb *iocb = NULL;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&vq->notify_lock, flags);
> +	if (!list_empty(&vq->notifier)) {
> +		iocb = list_first_entry(&vq->notifier,
> +				struct kiocb, ki_list);
> +		list_del(&iocb->ki_list);
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vq->notify_lock, flags);
> +	return iocb;
> +}
> +
> +static void handle_iocb(struct kiocb *iocb)
> +{
> +	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = iocb->private;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +        spin_lock_irqsave(&vq->notify_lock, flags);
> +        list_add_tail(&iocb->ki_list, &vq->notifier);
> +        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vq->notify_lock, flags);
> +}
> +

checkpatch.pl does not complain about the above?

> +static void handle_async_rx_events_notify(struct vhost_net *net,
> +					 struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> +					 struct socket *sock)

continuation lines should start to the right of (.

> +{
> +	struct kiocb *iocb = NULL;
> +	struct vhost_log *vq_log = NULL;
> +	int rx_total_len = 0;
> +	unsigned int head, log, in, out;
> +	int size;
> +
> +	if (vq->link_state != VHOST_VQ_LINK_ASYNC)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (sock->sk->sk_data_ready)
> +		sock->sk->sk_data_ready(sock->sk, 0);
> +
> +	vq_log = unlikely(vhost_has_feature(
> +				&net->dev, VHOST_F_LOG_ALL)) ? vq->log : NULL;

split the above line at ?, continuation being to the left of ( looks
ugly.

> +	while ((iocb = notify_dequeue(vq)) != NULL) {
> +		vhost_add_used_and_signal(&net->dev, vq,
> +				iocb->ki_pos, iocb->ki_nbytes);
> +		log = (int)(iocb->ki_user_data >> 32);

how about we always do the recompute step, and not encode
the log bit in ki_user_data?

> +		size = iocb->ki_nbytes;
> +		head = iocb->ki_pos;
> +		rx_total_len += iocb->ki_nbytes;
> +
> +		if (iocb->ki_dtor)
> +			iocb->ki_dtor(iocb);
> +		kmem_cache_free(net->cache, iocb);
> +
> +		/* when log is enabled, recomputing the log info is needed,
> +		 * since these buffers are in async queue, and may not get
> +		 * the log info before.
> +		 */
> +		if (unlikely(vq_log)) {
> +			if (!log)
> +				__vhost_get_vq_desc(&net->dev, vq, vq->iov,
> +						    ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov),
> +						    &out, &in, vq_log,
> +						    &log, head);
> +			vhost_log_write(vq, vq_log, log, size);
> +		}
> +		if (unlikely(rx_total_len >= VHOST_NET_WEIGHT)) {
> +			vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void handle_async_tx_events_notify(struct vhost_net *net,
> +					struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> +{
> +	struct kiocb *iocb = NULL;
> +	int tx_total_len = 0;
> +
> +	if (vq->link_state != VHOST_VQ_LINK_ASYNC)
> +		return;
> +
> +	while ((iocb = notify_dequeue(vq)) != NULL) {
> +		vhost_add_used_and_signal(&net->dev, vq,
> +				iocb->ki_pos, 0);
> +		tx_total_len += iocb->ki_nbytes;
> +
> +		if (iocb->ki_dtor)
> +			iocb->ki_dtor(iocb);
> +
> +		kmem_cache_free(net->cache, iocb);
> +		if (unlikely(tx_total_len >= VHOST_NET_WEIGHT)) {
> +			vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static struct kiocb *create_iocb(struct vhost_net *net,
> +				 struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> +				 unsigned head, unsigned log)
> +{
> +	struct kiocb *iocb = NULL;
> +
> +	if (vq->link_state != VHOST_VQ_LINK_ASYNC)
> +		return NULL; 
> +	iocb = kmem_cache_zalloc(net->cache, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!iocb)
> +		return NULL;
> +	iocb->private = vq;
> +	iocb->ki_pos = head;
> +	iocb->ki_dtor = handle_iocb;
> +	if (vq == &net->dev.vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX]) {
> +		iocb->ki_user_data = ((unsigned long)log << 32 | vq->num);
> +		iocb->ki_iovec = vq->hdr;
> +	}
> +	return iocb;
> +}
> +				 
>  /* Expects to be always run from workqueue - which acts as
>   * read-size critical section for our kind of RCU. */
>  static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>  {
>  	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &net->dev.vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX];
> +	struct kiocb *iocb = NULL;

do we need to init this?

>  	unsigned head, out, in, s;
>  	struct msghdr msg = {
>  		.msg_name = NULL,
> @@ -124,6 +248,8 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>  		tx_poll_stop(net);
>  	hdr_size = vq->hdr_size;
>  
> +	handle_async_tx_events_notify(net, vq);
> +
>  	for (;;) {
>  		head = vhost_get_vq_desc(&net->dev, vq, vq->iov,
>  					 ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov),
> @@ -151,6 +277,11 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>  		/* Skip header. TODO: support TSO. */
>  		s = move_iovec_hdr(vq->iov, vq->hdr, hdr_size, out);
>  		msg.msg_iovlen = out;
> +
> +		iocb = create_iocb(net, vq, head, 0);

For sync case, we can save some cycles by using iocb = NULL.

> +		if (vq->link_state == VHOST_VQ_LINK_ASYNC && !iocb)
> +			break;
> +
>  		len = iov_length(vq->iov, out);
>  		/* Sanity check */
>  		if (!len) {

Generally, I would like to reduce the number of places
where we do if (link_state == XXX) in code.
It should be possible to do this by splitting common code
out into functions.

> @@ -160,12 +291,18 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>  			break;
>  		}
>  		/* TODO: Check specific error and bomb out unless ENOBUFS? */
> -		err = sock->ops->sendmsg(NULL, sock, &msg, len);
> +		err = sock->ops->sendmsg(iocb, sock, &msg, len);
>  		if (unlikely(err < 0)) {
> +			if (vq->link_state == VHOST_VQ_LINK_ASYNC)
> +				kmem_cache_free(net->cache, iocb);
>  			vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq);
>  			tx_poll_start(net, sock);
>  			break;
>  		}
> +
> +		if (vq->link_state == VHOST_VQ_LINK_ASYNC)
> +			continue;
> +
>  		if (err != len)
>  			pr_err("Truncated TX packet: "
>  			       " len %d != %zd\n", err, len);
> @@ -177,6 +314,8 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	handle_async_tx_events_notify(net, vq);
> +
>  	mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
>  	unuse_mm(net->dev.mm);
>  }
> @@ -186,6 +325,7 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>  static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
>  {
>  	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &net->dev.vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX];
> +	struct kiocb *iocb = NULL;
>  	unsigned head, out, in, log, s;
>  	struct vhost_log *vq_log;
>  	struct msghdr msg = {
> @@ -206,7 +346,8 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
>  	int err;
>  	size_t hdr_size;
>  	struct socket *sock = rcu_dereference(vq->private_data);
> -	if (!sock || skb_queue_empty(&sock->sk->sk_receive_queue))
> +	if (!sock || (skb_queue_empty(&sock->sk->sk_receive_queue) &&
> +			vq->link_state == VHOST_VQ_LINK_SYNC))
>  		return;
>  
>  	use_mm(net->dev.mm);
> @@ -214,9 +355,17 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
>  	vhost_disable_notify(vq);
>  	hdr_size = vq->hdr_size;
>  
> +	/* In async cases, when write log is enabled, in case the submitted
> +	 * buffers did not get log info before the log enabling, so we'd
> +	 * better recompute the log info when needed. We do this in
> +	 * handle_async_rx_events_notify().
> +	 */
> +
>  	vq_log = unlikely(vhost_has_feature(&net->dev, VHOST_F_LOG_ALL)) ?
>  		vq->log : NULL;
>  
> +	handle_async_rx_events_notify(net, vq, sock);
> +
>  	for (;;) {
>  		head = vhost_get_vq_desc(&net->dev, vq, vq->iov,
>  					 ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov),
> @@ -245,6 +394,11 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
>  		s = move_iovec_hdr(vq->iov, vq->hdr, hdr_size, in);
>  		msg.msg_iovlen = in;
>  		len = iov_length(vq->iov, in);
> +
> +		iocb = create_iocb(net, vq, head, log);
> +		if (vq->link_state == VHOST_VQ_LINK_ASYNC && !iocb)
> +			break;
> +
>  		/* Sanity check */
>  		if (!len) {
>  			vq_err(vq, "Unexpected header len for RX: "
> @@ -252,13 +406,20 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
>  			       iov_length(vq->hdr, s), hdr_size);
>  			break;
>  		}
> -		err = sock->ops->recvmsg(NULL, sock, &msg,
> +
> +		err = sock->ops->recvmsg(iocb, sock, &msg,
>  					 len, MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_TRUNC);
>  		/* TODO: Check specific error and bomb out unless EAGAIN? */
>  		if (err < 0) {
> +			if (vq->link_state == VHOST_VQ_LINK_ASYNC)
> +				kmem_cache_free(net->cache, iocb);
>  			vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq);
>  			break;
>  		}
> +
> +		if (vq->link_state == VHOST_VQ_LINK_ASYNC)
> +			continue;
> +
>  		/* TODO: Should check and handle checksum. */
>  		if (err > len) {
>  			pr_err("Discarded truncated rx packet: "
> @@ -284,10 +445,13 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	handle_async_rx_events_notify(net, vq, sock);
> +
>  	mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
>  	unuse_mm(net->dev.mm);
>  }
>  
> +

don't do this

>  static void handle_tx_kick(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
> @@ -338,6 +502,7 @@ static int vhost_net_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
>  	vhost_poll_init(n->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX, handle_tx_net, POLLOUT);
>  	vhost_poll_init(n->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_RX, handle_rx_net, POLLIN);
>  	n->tx_poll_state = VHOST_NET_POLL_DISABLED;
> +	n->cache = NULL;
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -398,6 +563,18 @@ static void vhost_net_flush(struct vhost_net *n)
>  	vhost_net_flush_vq(n, VHOST_NET_VQ_RX);
>  }
>  
> +static void vhost_async_cleanup(struct vhost_net *n)
> +{
> +	/* clean the notifier */
> +	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &n->dev.vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX];
> +	struct kiocb *iocb = NULL;
> +	if (n->cache) {
> +		while ((iocb = notify_dequeue(vq)) != NULL)
> +			kmem_cache_free(n->cache, iocb);
> +		kmem_cache_destroy(n->cache);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static int vhost_net_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
>  {
>  	struct vhost_net *n = f->private_data;
> @@ -414,6 +591,7 @@ static int vhost_net_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
>  	/* We do an extra flush before freeing memory,
>  	 * since jobs can re-queue themselves. */
>  	vhost_net_flush(n);
> +	vhost_async_cleanup(n);
>  	kfree(n);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -462,7 +640,19 @@ static struct socket *get_tun_socket(int fd)
>  	return sock;
>  }
>  
> -static struct socket *get_socket(int fd)
> +static struct socket *get_mp_socket(int fd)
> +{
> +	struct file *file = fget(fd);
> +	struct socket *sock;
> +	if (!file)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EBADF);
> +	sock = mp_get_socket(file);
> +	if (IS_ERR(sock))
> +		fput(file);
> +	return sock;
> +}
> +
> +static struct socket *get_socket(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, int fd)
>  {
>  	struct socket *sock;
>  	if (fd == -1)
> @@ -473,9 +663,30 @@ static struct socket *get_socket(int fd)
>  	sock = get_tun_socket(fd);
>  	if (!IS_ERR(sock))
>  		return sock;
> +	sock = get_mp_socket(fd);
> +	if (!IS_ERR(sock)) {
> +		vq->link_state = VHOST_VQ_LINK_ASYNC;
> +		return sock;
> +	}
>  	return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSOCK);
>  }
>  
> +static void vhost_init_link_state(struct vhost_net *n, int index)
> +{
> +	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = n->vqs + index;
> +
> +	WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&vq->mutex));
> +	if (vq->link_state == VHOST_VQ_LINK_ASYNC) {
> +		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vq->notifier);
> +		spin_lock_init(&vq->notify_lock);
> +		if (!n->cache) {
> +			n->cache = kmem_cache_create("vhost_kiocb",
> +					sizeof(struct kiocb), 0,
> +					SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, NULL);
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static long vhost_net_set_backend(struct vhost_net *n, unsigned index, int fd)
>  {
>  	struct socket *sock, *oldsock;
> @@ -493,12 +704,15 @@ static long vhost_net_set_backend(struct vhost_net *n, unsigned index, int fd)
>  	}
>  	vq = n->vqs + index;
>  	mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
> -	sock = get_socket(fd);
> +	vq->link_state = VHOST_VQ_LINK_SYNC;
> +	sock = get_socket(vq, fd);
>  	if (IS_ERR(sock)) {
>  		r = PTR_ERR(sock);
>  		goto err;
>  	}
>  
> +	vhost_init_link_state(n, index);
> +

I think we should just teach get_socket to return link_state
in addition to the socket pointer, and pass the returned value to
vhost_init_link_state.

>  	/* start polling new socket */
>  	oldsock = vq->private_data;
>  	if (sock == oldsock)
> @@ -507,8 +721,8 @@ static long vhost_net_set_backend(struct vhost_net *n, unsigned index, int fd)
>  	vhost_net_disable_vq(n, vq);
>  	rcu_assign_pointer(vq->private_data, sock);
>  	vhost_net_enable_vq(n, vq);
> -	mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
>  done:
> +	mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
>  	mutex_unlock(&n->dev.mutex);
>  	if (oldsock) {
>  		vhost_net_flush_vq(n, index);

why the change above? Are you sure it's safe?  Need to be careful here:
doing everything under vq and dev mutex is much simpler.
If this change is required, need to review locking carefully
to make sure we are not introducing races.

> @@ -516,6 +730,7 @@ done:
>  	}
>  	return r;
>  err:
> +	mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
>  	mutex_unlock(&n->dev.mutex);
>  	return r;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index 97233d5..53dab80 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -715,66 +715,21 @@ static unsigned get_indirect(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -/* This looks in the virtqueue and for the first available buffer, and converts
> - * it to an iovec for convenient access.  Since descriptors consist of some
> - * number of output then some number of input descriptors, it's actually two
> - * iovecs, but we pack them into one and note how many of each there were.
> - *
> - * This function returns the descriptor number found, or vq->num (which
> - * is never a valid descriptor number) if none was found. */
> -unsigned vhost_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> +unsigned __vhost_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>  			   struct iovec iov[], unsigned int iov_size,
>  			   unsigned int *out_num, unsigned int *in_num,
> -			   struct vhost_log *log, unsigned int *log_num)
> +			   struct vhost_log *log, unsigned int *log_num,
> +			   unsigned int head)
>  {
>  	struct vring_desc desc;
> -	unsigned int i, head, found = 0;
> -	u16 last_avail_idx;
> +	unsigned int i = head, found = 0;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	/* Check it isn't doing very strange things with descriptor numbers. */
> -	last_avail_idx = vq->last_avail_idx;
> -	if (get_user(vq->avail_idx, &vq->avail->idx)) {
> -		vq_err(vq, "Failed to access avail idx at %p\n",
> -		       &vq->avail->idx);
> -		return vq->num;
> -	}
> -
> -	if ((u16)(vq->avail_idx - last_avail_idx) > vq->num) {
> -		vq_err(vq, "Guest moved used index from %u to %u",
> -		       last_avail_idx, vq->avail_idx);
> -		return vq->num;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* If there's nothing new since last we looked, return invalid. */
> -	if (vq->avail_idx == last_avail_idx)
> -		return vq->num;
> -
> -	/* Only get avail ring entries after they have been exposed by guest. */
> -	rmb();
> -
> -	/* Grab the next descriptor number they're advertising, and increment
> -	 * the index we've seen. */
> -	if (get_user(head, &vq->avail->ring[last_avail_idx % vq->num])) {
> -		vq_err(vq, "Failed to read head: idx %d address %p\n",
> -		       last_avail_idx,
> -		       &vq->avail->ring[last_avail_idx % vq->num]);
> -		return vq->num;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* If their number is silly, that's an error. */
> -	if (head >= vq->num) {
> -		vq_err(vq, "Guest says index %u > %u is available",
> -		       head, vq->num);
> -		return vq->num;
> -	}
> -
>  	/* When we start there are none of either input nor output. */
>  	*out_num = *in_num = 0;
>  	if (unlikely(log))
>  		*log_num = 0;
>  
> -	i = head;
>  	do {
>  		unsigned iov_count = *in_num + *out_num;
>  		if (i >= vq->num) {
> @@ -833,8 +788,70 @@ unsigned vhost_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>  			*out_num += ret;
>  		}
>  	} while ((i = next_desc(&desc)) != -1);
> +	return head;
> +}
> +
> +/* This looks in the virtqueue and for the first available buffer, and converts
> + * it to an iovec for convenient access.  Since descriptors consist of some
> + * number of output then some number of input descriptors, it's actually two
> + * iovecs, but we pack them into one and note how many of each there were.
> + *
> + * This function returns the descriptor number found, or vq->num (which
> + * is never a valid descriptor number) if none was found. */
> +unsigned vhost_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> +			   struct iovec iov[], unsigned int iov_size,
> +			   unsigned int *out_num, unsigned int *in_num,
> +			   struct vhost_log *log, unsigned int *log_num)
> +{
> +	struct vring_desc desc;
> +	unsigned int i, head, found = 0;
> +	u16 last_avail_idx;
> +	unsigned int ret;
> +
> +	/* Check it isn't doing very strange things with descriptor numbers. */
> +	last_avail_idx = vq->last_avail_idx;
> +	if (get_user(vq->avail_idx, &vq->avail->idx)) {
> +		vq_err(vq, "Failed to access avail idx at %p\n",
> +		       &vq->avail->idx);
> +		return vq->num;
> +	}
> +
> +	if ((u16)(vq->avail_idx - last_avail_idx) > vq->num) {
> +		vq_err(vq, "Guest moved used index from %u to %u",
> +		       last_avail_idx, vq->avail_idx);
> +		return vq->num;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* If there's nothing new since last we looked, return invalid. */
> +	if (vq->avail_idx == last_avail_idx)
> +		return vq->num;
> +
> +	/* Only get avail ring entries after they have been exposed by guest. */
> +	rmb();
> +
> +	/* Grab the next descriptor number they're advertising, and increment
> +	 * the index we've seen. */
> +	if (get_user(head, &vq->avail->ring[last_avail_idx % vq->num])) {
> +		vq_err(vq, "Failed to read head: idx %d address %p\n",
> +		       last_avail_idx,
> +		       &vq->avail->ring[last_avail_idx % vq->num]);
> +		return vq->num;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* If their number is silly, that's an error. */
> +	if (head >= vq->num) {
> +		vq_err(vq, "Guest says index %u > %u is available",
> +		       head, vq->num);
> +		return vq->num;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = __vhost_get_vq_desc(dev, vq, iov, iov_size,
> +				  out_num, in_num,
> +				  log, log_num, head);
>  
>  	/* On success, increment avail index. */
> +	if (ret == vq->num)
> +		return ret;
>  	vq->last_avail_idx++;
>  	return head;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> index d1f0453..8b95df8 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,11 @@ struct vhost_log {
>  	u64 len;
>  };
>  
> +enum vhost_vq_link_state {
> +	VHOST_VQ_LINK_SYNC = 	0,
> +	VHOST_VQ_LINK_ASYNC = 	1,

don't try to align values to the right, just put a single space each
side of =.

> +};
> +
>  /* The virtqueue structure describes a queue attached to a device. */
>  struct vhost_virtqueue {
>  	struct vhost_dev *dev;
> @@ -96,6 +101,10 @@ struct vhost_virtqueue {
>  	/* Log write descriptors */
>  	void __user *log_base;
>  	struct vhost_log log[VHOST_NET_MAX_SG];
> +	/*Differiate async socket for 0-copy from normal*/

spaces after /* and before */.

> +	enum vhost_vq_link_state link_state;
> +	struct list_head notifier;
> +	spinlock_t notify_lock;
>  };
>  
>  struct vhost_dev {
> @@ -122,6 +131,11 @@ unsigned vhost_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_dev *, struct vhost_virtqueue *,
>  			   struct iovec iov[], unsigned int iov_count,
>  			   unsigned int *out_num, unsigned int *in_num,
>  			   struct vhost_log *log, unsigned int *log_num);
> +unsigned __vhost_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_dev *, struct vhost_virtqueue *,
> +			   struct iovec iov[], unsigned int iov_count,
> +			   unsigned int *out_num, unsigned int *in_num,
> +			   struct vhost_log *log, unsigned int *log_num,
> +			   unsigned int head);
>  void vhost_discard_vq_desc(struct vhost_virtqueue *);
>  
>  int vhost_add_used(struct vhost_virtqueue *, unsigned int head, int len);
> -- 
> 1.5.4.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ