[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <v2v8bb80c381004211832o88258fdez8e640ad9a45d11c0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:32:22 -0700
From: Mike Chan <mike@...roid.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Salman <sqazi@...gle.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
arjan@...radead.org, csadler@...gle.com, ranjitm@...gle.com,
kenchen@...gle.com, dawnchen@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [idled]: Idle Cycle Injector for power capping
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 17:08 -0700, Salman wrote:
>> As we discussed earlier this year, Google has an implementation that it
>> would like to share. I have finally gotten around to porting it to
>> v2.6.33 and cleaning up the interfaces. It is provided in the following
>> messages for your review. I realize that when we first discussed this
>> idea, a lot of ideas were presented for enhancing it. Thanks alot for
>> your suggestions. I haven't gotten around to implementing any of them.
>
> .33 is way too old to submit patches against.
>
> That said, I really really dislike this approach, I would much rather
> see it tie in with power aware scheduling.
I may have missed this on lkml but are there any on-going community
efforts to power aware scheduling?
-- Mike
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists