lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100422190923.158036324@kvm.kroah.org>
Date:	Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:10:27 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...i.umich.edu>
Subject: [176/197] nfsd: ensure sockets are closed on error

2.6.32-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>

commit 301e99ce4a2f42a317129230fd42e6cd874c64b0 upstream.

One the changes in commit d7979ae4a "svc: Move close processing to a
single place" is:

  err_delete:
-       svc_delete_socket(svsk);
+       set_bit(SK_CLOSE, &svsk->sk_flags);
        return -EAGAIN;

This is insufficient. The recvfrom methods must always call
svc_xprt_received on completion so that the socket gets re-queued if
there is any more work to do.  This particular path did not make that
call because it actually destroyed the svsk, making requeue pointless.
When the svc_delete_socket was change to just set a bit, we should have
added a call to svc_xprt_received,

This is the problem that b0401d7253 attempted to fix, incorrectly.

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...i.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@ -968,6 +968,7 @@ static int svc_tcp_recv_record(struct sv
 	return len;
  err_delete:
 	set_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
+	svc_xprt_received(&svsk->sk_xprt);
  err_again:
 	return -EAGAIN;
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ