[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100422190918.971781814@kvm.kroah.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:09:41 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu@...hat.com>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
maximilian attems <max@...o.at>
Subject: [130/197] 9p: Skip check for mandatory locks when unlocking
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu@...hat.com>
commit f78233dd44a110c574fe760ad6f9c1e8741a0d00 upstream.
While investigating a bug, I came across a possible bug in v9fs. The
problem is similar to the one reported for NFS by ASANO Masahiro in
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/12/21/334.
v9fs_file_lock() will skip locks on file which has mode set to 02666.
This is a problem in cases where the mode of the file is changed after
a process has obtained a lock on the file. Such a lock will be skipped
during unlock and the machine will end up with a BUG in
locks_remove_flock().
v9fs_file_lock() should skip the check for mandatory locks when
unlocking a file.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>
Cc: maximilian attems <max@...o.at>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
fs/9p/vfs_file.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static int v9fs_file_lock(struct file *f
P9_DPRINTK(P9_DEBUG_VFS, "filp: %p lock: %p\n", filp, fl);
/* No mandatory locks */
- if (__mandatory_lock(inode))
+ if (__mandatory_lock(inode) && fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK)
return -ENOLCK;
if ((IS_SETLK(cmd) || IS_SETLKW(cmd)) && fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists