[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04391A4E90BB2149B010D22452FA1687B99CCFDD@HQ-EXCH-6.corp.brocade.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:50:31 -0700
From: Jing Huang <huangj@...cade.COM>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "sfr@...b.auug.org.au" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"James.Bottomley@...e.de" <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Krishna Gudipati <kgudipat@...cade.com>,
Ramkumar Vadivelu <rvadivel@...cade.COM>,
Vinodh Ravindran <vravindr@...cade.COM>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] bfa: fix compilation warning in powerpc (resend)
>> Fix the compilation warning in powerpc.
>
>When fixing a warning, please quote that warning in the patch description!
>
><does a cross-build>
>
>It seems that you're referring to this:
>
>drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c: In function 'bfa_ioc_msgget':
>drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c:1331: warning: value computed is not used
>drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc_ct.c: In function 'bfa_ioc_ct_notify_hbfail':
>drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc_ct.c:177: warning: value computed is not used
>drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc_ct.c:180: warning: value computed is not used
>drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc_ct.c: In function 'bfa_ioc_ct_pll_init':
>drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc_ct.c:381: warning: value computed is not used
>drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc_ct.c: In function 'bfa_ioc_ct_ownership_reset':
>drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc_ct.c:421: warning: value computed is not used
>drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc_cb.c: In function 'bfa_ioc_cb_notify_hbfail':
>drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc_cb.c:99: warning: value computed is not used
>drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc_cb.c: In function 'bfa_ioc_cb_ownership_reset':
>drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc_cb.c:272: warning: value computed is not used
>
>
>> The same change also fixes endian
>> issue we found in powerpc test.
>
>When fixing a bug, please fully describe the bug!
>
>If this driver has "endian issues" on powerpc then it's quite possible
>that this is a running-around-with-hair-on-fire,
>must-backport-to-2.6.33.x bugfix.
>
>But how would I know? You didn't tell me!
>
Hi Andrew,
Sorry about the obscure description of the patch, I will provide detailed
description in the future patch submission.
Yes this patch is intended to fix the compilation warning you listed above.
Regarding the big endian issue I mentioned, basically I remove an
unnecessary word swap in bfa_os_reg_read() and bfa_os_reg_write()
because the kernel provided readl and writel are already doing so. The
compilation warning also goes away after this change. For
bfa_os_mem_read() and bfa_os_mem_write() macros, I add a swap since
these two macros are designed to read/write from/to a memory region
that is in BE format per ASIC spec.
Thanks
Jing
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists