linux-kernel - [090/197] x86: hpet: Make WARN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100422190915.448262052@kvm.kroah.org>
Date:	Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:09:01 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Subject: [090/197] x86: hpet: Make WARN_ON understandable

2.6.32-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

commit 18ed61da985c57eea3fe8038b13fa2837c9b3c3f upstream.

Andrew complained rightly that the WARN_ON in hpet_next_event() is
confusing and the code comment not really helpful.

Change it to WARN_ONCE and print the reason in clear text. Change the
comment to explain what kind of hardware wreckage we deal with.

Pointed-out-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c |   19 +++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
@@ -385,11 +385,22 @@ static int hpet_next_event(unsigned long
 	hpet_writel(cnt, HPET_Tn_CMP(timer));
 
 	/*
-	 * We need to read back the CMP register to make sure that
-	 * what we wrote hit the chip before we compare it to the
-	 * counter.
+	 * We need to read back the CMP register on certain HPET
+	 * implementations (ATI chipsets) which seem to delay the
+	 * transfer of the compare register into the internal compare
+	 * logic. With small deltas this might actually be too late as
+	 * the counter could already be higher than the compare value
+	 * at that point and we would wait for the next hpet interrupt
+	 * forever. We found out that reading the CMP register back
+	 * forces the transfer so we can rely on the comparison with
+	 * the counter register below. If the read back from the
+	 * compare register does not match the value we programmed
+	 * then we might have a real hardware problem. We can not do
+	 * much about it here, but at least alert the user/admin with
+	 * a prominent warning.
 	 */
-	WARN_ON_ONCE((u32)hpet_readl(HPET_Tn_CMP(timer)) != cnt);
+	WARN_ONCE((u32)hpet_readl(HPET_Tn_CMP(timer)) != cnt,
+		  KERN_WARNING "hpet: compare register read back failed.\n");
 
 	return (s32)((u32)hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER) - cnt) >= 0 ? -ETIME : 0;
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/