linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] freezer cgroup: Fix an RCU warning in cgroup_freezing_or

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1271966935.1646.4.camel@laptop>
Date:	Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:08:55 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"containers@...ts.osdl.org" <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
	Cedric Le Goater <clg@...t.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] freezer cgroup: Fix an RCU warning in
 cgroup_freezing_or_frozen()

On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 12:59 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 02:27:55PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 17:31 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> > > with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU, a warning can be triggered when we
> > > resume from suspend:
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > include/linux/cgroup.h:533 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > task_freezer() calls task_subsys_state(), which needs to be
> > > protected by rcu_read_lock or cgroup_mutex.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
> > > ---
> > >  kernel/cgroup_freezer.c |    2 ++
> > >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c b/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
> > > index 5038f4c..ac76983 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
> > > @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ int cgroup_freezing_or_frozen(struct task_struct *task)
> > >  	struct freezer *freezer;
> > >  	enum freezer_state state;
> > >  
> > > +	rcu_read_lock();
> > >  	task_lock(task);
> > >  	freezer = task_freezer(task);
> > >  	if (!freezer->css.cgroup->parent)
> > > @@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ int cgroup_freezing_or_frozen(struct task_struct *task)
> > >  	else
> > >  		state = freezer->state;
> > >  	task_unlock(task);
> > > +	rcu_read_unlock();
> > >  
> > >  	return (state == CGROUP_FREEZING) || (state == CGROUP_FROZEN);
> > >  }
> > 
> > Hmm cgroup_attach_task() does hold task_lock() over setting
> > tsk->cgroups, so doesn't that also pin the task to the cgroup and thus
> > the cgroup itself?
> 
> So you are advocating for the rcu_dereference check including the
> task lock, correct?

I think that might be correct yes, although I would prefer confirmation
from someone who actually knows kernel/cgroup.c ;-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/