| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100422195852.GA2391@tuxdriver.com> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:58:53 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com> To: Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: What's the staging review and acceptance process? On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:42:45AM +0200, Olivier Galibert wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:12:42PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:55:18PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > Not really, patchwork shows status immediately. > > > > Immediately when someone does something with it, right? So, the same as > > my development cycle? > > I guess the main difference is that patchwork allows one contributor > to see that his patch has just not been checked yet, vs. missed/lost. In Greg's defense, I find patchwork to be fairly unwieldy (which is why I don't use it). It is certainly possible that I am missing some key feature, but my limited experience with it suggested to me that all the clicky-clicky stuff required to deal with the individual messages queued in patchwork nearly doubled my time overhead associated with merging patches. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@...driver.com might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists