[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1aasvkupc.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:07:11 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Haren Myneni <hbabu@...ibm.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add second memory region for crash kernel
Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com> writes:
> Patch applies to 2.6.34-rc5
>
> On x86 platform, even if hardware is 64-bit capable, kernel starts
> execution in 32-bit mode. When system is kdump-enabled, crashed kernel
> switches to 32 bit mode and jumps into new kernel. This automatically
> limits location of dump-capture kernel image and it's initrd by first
> 4Gb of memory. Switching to 32 bit mode is performed by purgatory
> code, which has relocations of type R_X86_64_32S (32-bit signed), and
> this cuts "good" address space for crash kernel down to 2 Gb. I/O
> regions may cut down this space further.
>
> When system has a lot of memory (hundreds of gigabytes), dump-capture
> kernel also needs relatively a lot of memory to account old kernel's
> pages. It may be impossible to reserve enough memory below 2 or even 4
> Gb. Simplest solution is it break dump-capture kernel's reserved
> memory region into two pieces: first (small) region for kernel and
> initrd images may be easily placed in "good" address space in the
> beginning of physical memory, and second region may be located
> anywhere.
>
> This serie of patches realizes this approach. It requires also changes
> in kexec utility to make this feature work, but is
> backward-compatible: old versions of kexec will work with new
> kernel. I will post patch to kexec-tools upstream separately.
Have you tried loading a 64bit vmlinux directly into a higher address
range? There may be a bit or two missing but you should be able to
load a linux kernel above 4GB. I tested the basics of that mechanism
when I made the 64bit relocatable kernel.
I don't buy the argument that there is a direct connection between
the amount of memory you have and how much memory it takes to dump it.
Even an indirect connections seems suspicious.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists