linux-kernel - Re: What's the staging review and acceptance process?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:46:35 +0200
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What's the staging review and acceptance process?

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 01:18:19PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:17:08AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:49:02 -0700
> > Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 09:25:57PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 20:45 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > That caused the huge backlog staring at
> > > > > me right now.
> > > > 
> > > > Which likely discouraged the new contributors who
> > > > submitted stuff still in that backlog.
> > > 
> > > While a series of unfortunate events did happen to cause this, do you
> > > have any evidence of this causing people to go away? 
> > 
> > Subjectively the answer is yes I think. More quantatively it was the case.
> > I did some measurements long ago with 2.4-ac and there was direct and
> > clear connection between two things and patch submission/activity levels.
> > One was 'cycle time' (ie time from submit->response->tree) - the other was
> > putting the name of the contributor in the per -ac patch summaries that
> > used to get mailed out.
> 
> Yeah, I know I liked seeing my name there, that was very nice to have :)

For this exact reason, I pay a lot of attention to credit the people who
contribute some work, even if I have to adapt it afterwards. I've long
observed that doing this is essential if you want to see them come again
with some nice work.

Concerning the delay, it's even a tunable. When I took over 2.4, I did
not realize that being too much reactive to mails became an incitation
for submitters to send many many things. After some time (primarily due
to lack of time), I started to work by batches and I noticed that the
submission rates dramatically dropped. So I totally agree with Alan here.

BTW Greg, I too remember the time when a buddy was excited to forward to
me an announce from Alan where my name was cited :-)

Regards,
Willy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/