[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zl0u654q.wl%vmayatsk@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:43:17 +0200
From: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com>
To: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Haren Myneni <hbabu@...ibm.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add second memory region for crash kernel
At Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:42:25 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > We have observed that on a machine which has 66G memory, when we do
> > crashkernel=1G@4G, kexec failed to load the crash kernel, but the memory
> > reservation _did_ succeed.
>
> Did you try loading vmlinux? If not this sounds like the fact that
> /sbin/kexec doesn't realize it can boot a 64bit bzImage in 64bit
> mode.
/sbin/kexec currently has hardcoded limitations for bzImage and
initrd:
include/x86/x86-linux.h:
#define DEFAULT_INITRD_ADDR_MAX 0x37FFFFFF
#define DEFAULT_BZIMAGE_ADDR_MAX 0x37FFFFFF
This is easy to override. However, purgatory code still wants to see
kernel below 2 Gb (32-bit signed relocations).
--
wbr, Vitaly
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists