linux-kernel - [tip:core/urgent] mutex: Don't spin when the owner CPU is offline or other weird cases

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-4b402210486c6414fe5fbfd85934a0a22da56b04@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:49:40 GMT
From:	tip-bot for Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:core/urgent] mutex: Don't spin when the owner CPU is offline or other weird cases

Commit-ID:  4b402210486c6414fe5fbfd85934a0a22da56b04
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/4b402210486c6414fe5fbfd85934a0a22da56b04
Author:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
AuthorDate: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 23:20:00 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:00:28 +0200

mutex: Don't spin when the owner CPU is offline or other weird cases

Due to recent load-balancer changes that delay the task migration to
the next wakeup, the adaptive mutex spinning ends up in a live lock
when the owner's CPU gets offlined because the cpu_online() check
lives before the owner running check.

This patch changes mutex_spin_on_owner() to return 0 (don't spin) in
any case where we aren't sure about the owner struct validity or CPU
number, and if the said CPU is offline. There is no point going back &
re-evaluate spinning in corner cases like that, let's just go to
sleep.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1271212509.13059.135.camel@...glop>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
 kernel/sched.c |    8 ++++----
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 6af210a..de0bd26 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -3780,7 +3780,7 @@ int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct thread_info *owner)
 	 * the mutex owner just released it and exited.
 	 */
 	if (probe_kernel_address(&owner->cpu, cpu))
-		goto out;
+		return 0;
 #else
 	cpu = owner->cpu;
 #endif
@@ -3790,14 +3790,14 @@ int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct thread_info *owner)
 	 * the cpu field may no longer be valid.
 	 */
 	if (cpu >= nr_cpumask_bits)
-		goto out;
+		return 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * We need to validate that we can do a
 	 * get_cpu() and that we have the percpu area.
 	 */
 	if (!cpu_online(cpu))
-		goto out;
+		return 0;
 
 	rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 
@@ -3816,7 +3816,7 @@ int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct thread_info *owner)
 
 		cpu_relax();
 	}
-out:
+
 	return 1;
 }
 #endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/