[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100423195127.48095127.toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:51:27 +0900
From: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: keyrings@...ux-nfs.org, security@...nel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1][BUG][TAKE2] KEYRINGS: find_keyring_by_name() can gain
the freed keyring
From: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@...fujitsu.com>
With linux-2.6.34-rc5, find_keyring_by_name() can gain the keyring which has
been already freed. And then, its space (which is gained by
find_keyring_by_name()) is broken by accessing the freed keyring as the
available keyring.
This problem is serious because it may trigger the user data destructions.
[Figure Description](Example)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|(cleaner) (user)
| free_user(user) sys_keyctl()
| | |
| key_put(user->session_keyring) keyctl_get_keyring_ID()
| || //=> keyring->usage = 0 |
| |schedule_work(&key_cleanup_task) lookup_user_key()
| || |
| kmem_cache_free(,user) |
| . |[KEY_SPEC_USER_KEYRING]
| . install_user_keyrings()
| . ||
| key_cleanup() [<= worker_thread()] ||
| | ||
| [spin_lock(&key_serial_lock)] |[mutex_lock(&key_user_keyr..mutex)]
| | ||
| atomic_read() == 0 ||
| |{ rb_ease(&key->serial_node,) } ||
| | ||
| [spin_unlock(&key_serial_lock)] |find_keyring_by_name()
| | |||
| keyring_destroy(keyring) ||[read_lock(&keyring_name_lock)]
| || |||
| |[write_lock(&keyring_name_lock)] ||atomic_inc(&keyring->usage)
| |. ||| *** GET freeing keyring ***
| |. ||[read_unlock(&keyring_name_lock)]
| || ||
| |list_del() |[mutex_unlock(&key_user_k..mutex)]
| || |
| |[write_unlock(&keyring_name_lock)] ** INVALID keyring is returned **
| | .
| kmem_cache_free(,keyring) .
| .
| atomic_dec(&keyring->usage)
v *** DESTROYED ***
TIME
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
If CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is configured, we may see the following message in
dmesg:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
=============================================================================
BUG key_jar: Poison overwritten
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
INFO: 0xffff880197a7e200-0xffff880197a7e200. First byte 0x6a instead of 0x6b
INFO: Allocated in key_alloc+0x10b/0x35f age=25 cpu=1 pid=5086
INFO: Freed in key_cleanup+0xd0/0xd5 age=12 cpu=1 pid=10
INFO: Slab 0xffffea000592cb90 objects=16 used=2 fp=0xffff880197a7e200 flags=0x200000000000c3
INFO: Object 0xffff880197a7e200 @offset=512 fp=0xffff880197a7e300
Bytes b4 0xffff880197a7e1f0: 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Object 0xffff880197a7e200: 6a 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b jkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Otherwise, such a system panic may happen:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
<1>BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000001
<1>IP: [<ffffffff810e61a3>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x5b/0xe9
<4>PGD 6b2b4067 PUD 6a80d067 PMD 0
<0>Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
<0>last sysfs file: /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_loaded
<4>CPU 1
...
<4>Pid: 31245, comm: su Not tainted 2.6.34-rc5-nofixed-nodebug #2 D2089/PRIMERGY
<4>RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810e61a3>] [<ffffffff810e61a3>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x5b/0xe9
<4>RSP: 0018:ffff88006af3bd98 EFLAGS: 00010002
<4>RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffff88007d19900b
<4>RDX: 0000000100000000 RSI: 00000000000080d0 RDI: ffffffff81828430
<4>RBP: ffffffff81828430 R08: ffff88000a293750 R09: 0000000000000000
<4>R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000100000 R12: 00000000000080d0
<4>R13: 00000000000080d0 R14: 0000000000000296 R15: ffffffff810f20ce
<4>FS: 00007f97116bc700(0000) GS:ffff88000a280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
<4>CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
<4>CR2: 0000000000000001 CR3: 000000006a91c000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
<4>DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
<4>DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
<4>Process su (pid: 31245, threadinfo ffff88006af3a000, task ffff8800374414c0)
<0>Stack:
<4> 0000000512e0958e 0000000000008000 ffff880037f8d180 0000000000000001
<4><0> 0000000000000000 0000000000008001 ffff88007d199000 ffffffff810f20ce
<4><0> 0000000000008000 ffff88006af3be48 0000000000000024 ffffffff810face3
<0>Call Trace:
<4> [<ffffffff810f20ce>] ? get_empty_filp+0x70/0x12f
<4> [<ffffffff810face3>] ? do_filp_open+0x145/0x590
<4> [<ffffffff810ce208>] ? tlb_finish_mmu+0x2a/0x33
<4> [<ffffffff810ce43c>] ? unmap_region+0xd3/0xe2
<4> [<ffffffff810e4393>] ? virt_to_head_page+0x9/0x2d
<4> [<ffffffff81103916>] ? alloc_fd+0x69/0x10e
<4> [<ffffffff810ef4ed>] ? do_sys_open+0x56/0xfc
<4> [<ffffffff81008a02>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
<0>Code: 0f 1f 44 00 00 49 89 c6 fa 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 65 4c 8b 04 25 60 e8 00 00 48 8b 45 00 49 01 c0 49 8b 18 48 85 db 74 0d 48 63 45 18 <48> 8b 04 03 49 89 00 eb 14 4c 89 f9 83 ca ff 44 89 e6 48 89 ef
<1>RIP [<ffffffff810e61a3>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x5b/0xe9
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
This root cause is not to confirm the keyring is valid.
So, adding its validate confirmation with spin_lock(&key_serial_lock)
can fix this problem.
[Figure Description]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|(cleaner) (user)
| free_user(user) sys_keyctl()
| | |
| key_put(user->session_keyring) keyctl_get_keyring_ID()
| || //=> keyring->usage = 0 |
| |schedule_work(&key_cleanup_task) lookup_user_key()
| || |
| kmem_cache_free(,user) |
| . |[KEY_SPEC_USER_KEYRING]
| . install_user_keyrings()
| . ||
| key_cleanup() [<= worker_thread()] |[mutex_lock(&key_user_keyr..mutex)]
| | ||
| | |find_keyring_by_name()
| | |||
| | ||[read_lock(&keyring_name_lock)]
| | |||
| | ||atomic_inc_return(&ke..->usage)==1
| | ||| Freeing! will return with -ENOKEY
| | ||[spin_lock(&key_serial_lock)]
| | |||
| | ||atomic_set(&keyring->usage, 0)
| | ||| prevent from not starting freeing
| [spin_lock(&key_serial_lock)] ||| let key_cleanup() release this
| . ||[spin_unlock(&key_serial_lock)]
| | |||
| atomic_read(&keyring->usage) == 0 ||[read_unlock(&keyring_name_lock)]
| { rb_ease(&key->serial_node,) } ||
| | |[mutex_unlock(&key_user_k..mutex)]
| [spin_unlock(&key_serial_lock)] |
| | ** Keyring is not found. **
| keyring_destroy(keyring)
| ||
| |[write_lock(&keyring_name_lock)]
| ||
| |list_del()
| ||
| |[write_unlock(&keyring_name_lock)]
| |
| kmem_cache_free(,keyring)
v
TIME
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Signed-off-by: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---
security/keys/keyring.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/keys/keyring.c b/security/keys/keyring.c
index e814d21..ec16456 100644
--- a/security/keys/keyring.c
+++ b/security/keys/keyring.c
@@ -555,13 +555,22 @@ struct key *find_keyring_by_name(const char *name, bool skip_perm_check)
KEY_SEARCH) < 0)
continue;
- /* we've got a match */
- atomic_inc(&keyring->usage);
+ /* we've got a match but must confirm this key
+ * is still valid */
+ if (atomic_inc_return(&keyring->usage) == 1) {
+ spin_lock(&key_serial_lock);
+ /* If this keyring is not still started freeing,
+ * we must let key_cleanup() release this */
+ atomic_set(&keyring->usage, 0);
+ spin_unlock(&key_serial_lock);
+ goto not_found;
+ }
read_unlock(&keyring_name_lock);
goto error;
}
}
+not_found:
read_unlock(&keyring_name_lock);
keyring = ERR_PTR(-ENOKEY);
--
1.5.5.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists