linux-kernel - Re: Threaded irq handler question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:29:07 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Will Newton <will.newton@...il.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: Threaded irq handler question

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 05:35:32PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:

> I have a threaded irq handler attached to a level-triggered gpio
> interrupt line. The check handler checks the status of the gpio line
> and disables the irq line amd returns WAKE_THREAD in that case:

...

> My problem is that this structure does not work, because once I call
> disable_irq_nosync() on the irq in the check handler the thread will
> no longer run because the irq is disabled. However if I don't call
> disable_irq_nosync() I will get endless irqs because the line is
> level-triggered and will not be deasserted until the thread has run.

> Could someone tell me what I'm doing wrong here?

The genirq framework has native support for doing this using a oneshot
IRQ handler - if you request the IRQ with IRQF_ONESHOT and provide only 
a threaded IRQ handler then genirq will disable the interrupt when the
primary IRQ fires and schedule the threaded handler.

See wm831x or wm8350 for an example.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/