| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1271984938-13920-8-git-send-email-arve@android.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:08:56 -0700
From: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
To: linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@...ial.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 7/9] PM: Add suspend blocking work.
Allow work to be queued that will block suspend while it is pending
or executing. To get the same functionality in the calling code often
requires a separate suspend_blocker for pending and executing work, or
additional state and locking.
Signed-off-by: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
---
include/linux/workqueue.h | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
kernel/workqueue.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
index 9466e86..9c5a078 100644
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include <linux/linkage.h>
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/lockdep.h>
+#include <linux/suspend_blocker.h>
#include <asm/atomic.h>
struct workqueue_struct;
@@ -26,7 +27,8 @@ struct work_struct {
atomic_long_t data;
#define WORK_STRUCT_PENDING 0 /* T if work item pending execution */
#define WORK_STRUCT_STATIC 1 /* static initializer (debugobjects) */
-#define WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK (3UL)
+#define WORK_STRUCT_SUSPEND_BLOCKING 2 /* suspend blocking work */
+#define WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK (7UL)
#define WORK_STRUCT_WQ_DATA_MASK (~WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK)
struct list_head entry;
work_func_t func;
@@ -48,6 +50,23 @@ static inline struct delayed_work *to_delayed_work(struct work_struct *work)
return container_of(work, struct delayed_work, work);
}
+struct suspend_blocking_work {
+ struct work_struct work;
+ struct suspend_blocker suspend_blocker;
+};
+
+static inline struct suspend_blocking_work *
+to_suspend_blocking_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ return container_of(work, struct suspend_blocking_work, work);
+}
+
+static inline struct suspend_blocker *
+work_to_suspend_blocker(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ return &to_suspend_blocking_work(work)->suspend_blocker;
+}
+
struct execute_work {
struct work_struct work;
};
@@ -157,6 +176,30 @@ static inline void destroy_work_on_stack(struct work_struct *work) { }
init_timer_deferrable(&(_work)->timer); \
} while (0)
+static inline void suspend_blocking_work_init(
+ struct suspend_blocking_work *work, work_func_t func, const char *name)
+{
+ INIT_WORK(&work->work, func);
+ suspend_blocker_init(&work->suspend_blocker, name);
+ set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_SUSPEND_BLOCKING, work_data_bits(&work->work));
+}
+
+/**
+ * suspend_blocking_work_destroy - Destroy suspend_blocking_work
+ * @work: The work item in question
+ *
+ * If the work was ever queued on more then one workqueue or on a multithreaded
+ * workqueue all these workqueues must be flushed before calling
+ * suspend_blocking_work_destroy. If only a single singlethreaded workqueue
+ * was used flush_work or cancel_work_sync can be used instead.
+ */
+
+static inline void
+suspend_blocking_work_destroy(struct suspend_blocking_work *work)
+{
+ suspend_blocker_destroy(&work->suspend_blocker);
+}
+
/**
* work_pending - Find out whether a work item is currently pending
* @work: The work item in question
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index dee4865..b2aba90 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -68,6 +68,15 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
#endif
};
+static inline int work_blocks_suspend(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND_BLOCKERS
+ return test_bit(WORK_STRUCT_SUSPEND_BLOCKING, work_data_bits(work));
+#else
+ return false;
+#endif
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_WORK
static struct debug_obj_descr work_debug_descr;
@@ -257,6 +266,10 @@ static void __queue_work(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq,
debug_work_activate(work);
spin_lock_irqsave(&cwq->lock, flags);
+
+ if (work_blocks_suspend(work))
+ suspend_block(work_to_suspend_blocker(work));
+
insert_work(cwq, work, &cwq->worklist);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cwq->lock, flags);
}
@@ -379,6 +392,7 @@ static void run_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
struct work_struct *work = list_entry(cwq->worklist.next,
struct work_struct, entry);
work_func_t f = work->func;
+ bool current_work_blocks_suspend = work_blocks_suspend(work);
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
/*
* It is permissible to free the struct work_struct
@@ -416,6 +430,9 @@ static void run_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
}
spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
+ if (current_work_blocks_suspend &&
+ (get_wq_data(work) == cwq) && !work_pending(work))
+ suspend_unblock(work_to_suspend_blocker(work));
cwq->current_work = NULL;
}
spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
@@ -671,6 +688,8 @@ static int __cancel_work_timer(struct work_struct *work,
wait_on_work(work);
} while (unlikely(ret < 0));
+ if (work_blocks_suspend(work))
+ suspend_unblock(work_to_suspend_blocker(work));
work_clear_pending(work);
return ret;
}
--
1.6.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists