linux-kernel - [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 06/12] KEYS: Fix an RCU warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:43:24 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 06/12] KEYS: Fix an RCU warning

From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>

Fix the following RCU warning:

===================================================
[ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
---------------------------------------------------
security/keys/request_key.c:116 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!

other info that might help us debug this:

rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
1 lock held by keyctl/5372:
 #0:  (key_types_sem){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff811a4e3d>] key_type_lookup+0x1c/0x70

stack backtrace:
Pid: 5372, comm: keyctl Not tainted 2.6.34-rc3-cachefs #150
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff810515f8>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xaa/0xb2
 [<ffffffff811a9220>] call_sbin_request_key+0x156/0x2b6
 [<ffffffff811a4c66>] ? __key_instantiate_and_link+0xb1/0xdc
 [<ffffffff811a4cd3>] ? key_instantiate_and_link+0x42/0x5f
 [<ffffffff811a96b8>] ? request_key_auth_new+0x17b/0x1f3
 [<ffffffff811a8e00>] ? request_key_and_link+0x271/0x400
 [<ffffffff810aba6f>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xe1/0x118
 [<ffffffff811a8f1a>] request_key_and_link+0x38b/0x400
 [<ffffffff811a7b72>] sys_request_key+0xf7/0x14a
 [<ffffffff81052227>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10c/0x130
 [<ffffffff81393f5c>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
 [<ffffffff81001eeb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

This was caused by doing:

	[root@...romeda ~]# keyctl newring fred @s
	539196288
	[root@...romeda ~]# keyctl request2 user a a 539196288
	request_key: Required key not available

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 security/keys/request_key.c |   13 ++++++++-----
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/keys/request_key.c b/security/keys/request_key.c
index 03fe63e..ea97c31 100644
--- a/security/keys/request_key.c
+++ b/security/keys/request_key.c
@@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ static int call_sbin_request_key(struct key_construction *cons,
 {
 	const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
 	key_serial_t prkey, sskey;
-	struct key *key = cons->key, *authkey = cons->authkey, *keyring;
+	struct key *key = cons->key, *authkey = cons->authkey, *keyring,
+		*session;
 	char *argv[9], *envp[3], uid_str[12], gid_str[12];
 	char key_str[12], keyring_str[3][12];
 	char desc[20];
@@ -112,10 +113,12 @@ static int call_sbin_request_key(struct key_construction *cons,
 	if (cred->tgcred->process_keyring)
 		prkey = cred->tgcred->process_keyring->serial;
 
-	if (cred->tgcred->session_keyring)
-		sskey = rcu_dereference(cred->tgcred->session_keyring)->serial;
-	else
-		sskey = cred->user->session_keyring->serial;
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	session = rcu_dereference(cred->tgcred->session_keyring);
+	if (!session)
+		session = cred->user->session_keyring;
+	sskey = session->serial;
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	sprintf(keyring_str[2], "%d", sskey);
 
-- 
1.7.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/