linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] e100: expose broadcast

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:02:07 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	Erwan Velu <erwanaliasr1@...il.com>
Cc:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
	bruce.w.allan@...el.com, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
	peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, john.ronciak@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e100: expose broadcast_disabled as a module option

On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:03:59 +0200
Erwan Velu <erwanaliasr1@...il.com> wrote:

> I first tried "ifconfig -broadcast" without any success, so I forced
> the driver to unset IFF_BROADCAST, the interface didn't showed anymore
> the BROADCAST option with ifconfig. But I didn't noticed any reduction
> in the amount of context/switches on my host.
> 
> I found the broadcast_disabled far more efficient when considering the
> cpu impact.

The point is that the driver can look at IFF_BROADCAST rather than having
module parameter. Module parameters are device driver specific and should
be avoid as much as possible in favor of general mechanism. This is a repeated
problem where users and vendors make special hooks that only work with their
driver, which makes life hard for other users and distribution providers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/