[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100423030052.GC32490@count0.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:00:52 -0700
From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Lai JIangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
Cedric Le Goater <clg@...t.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"containers@...ts.osdl.org" <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: Check task_lock in task_subsys_state()
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:35:52AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> task_subsys_state() is safe under task_lock(). See
> Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt for locking rule.
>
> This fixes an RCU warning when resume from suspend. The
> warning comes from freezer cgroup in cgroup_freezing_or_frozen().
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
> ---
>
> I'm not sure which is preferable - access ->alloc_lock directly
> like this patch or add task_lock_is_held() in sched.h
>
> ---
> include/linux/cgroup.h | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> index b8ad1ea..8f78073 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> @@ -530,6 +530,7 @@ static inline struct cgroup_subsys_state *task_subsys_state(
> {
> return rcu_dereference_check(task->cgroups->subsys[subsys_id],
> rcu_read_lock_held() ||
> + lockdep_is_held(&task->alloc_lock) ||
> cgroup_lock_is_held());
> }
>
> --
> 1.6.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists