[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100423033933.GA2619@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:39:33 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] mm,migration: Allow the migration of
PageSwapCache pages
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:14:04AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Minchan Kim wrote:
>
> > For further optimization, we can hold vma->adjust_lock if vma_address
> > returns -EFAULT. But I hope we redesigns it without new locking.
> > But I don't have good idea, now. :(
>
> You could make it atomic through the use of RCU.
>
> Create a new vma entry with the changed parameters and then atomically
> switch to the new vma.
>
> Problem is that you have some list_heads in there.
Indeed, it would be necessary to update -all- pointers to the old
vma entry to point to the new vma entry. The question at that point
will be "is it OK to switch the pointers over one at a time?"
In many situations, the answer is "yes", but it is necessary to check
carefully.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists