| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:58:14 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [BUGFIX][PATCH] memcg rcu lock fix v2
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:55:16 +0800
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Li Zefan wrote:
> > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> >> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:00:41 +0800
> >> Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y, I saw this warning, it's because
> >>> css_id() is not under rcu_read_lock().
> >>>
> >> Ok. Thank you for reporting.
> >> This is ok ?
> >
> > Yes, and I did some more simple tests on memcg, no more warning
> > showed up.
> >
>
> oops, after trigging oom, I saw 2 more warnings:
>
Thank you for good testing.
=
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
css_id() should be called under rcu_read_lock().
And css_is_ancestor() should be called under rcu_read_lock().
Following is a report from Li Zefan.
==
===================================================
[ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
---------------------------------------------------
kernel/cgroup.c:4438 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
1 lock held by kswapd0/31:
#0: (swap_lock){+.+.-.}, at: [<c05058bb>] swap_info_get+0x4b/0xd0
stack backtrace:
Pid: 31, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.34-rc5-tip+ #13
Call Trace:
[<c083c5d6>] ? printk+0x1d/0x1f
[<c0480744>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0x94/0xb0
[<c049d6ed>] css_id+0x5d/0x60
[<c05165a5>] mem_cgroup_uncharge_swapcache+0x45/0xa0
[<c0505e4f>] swapcache_free+0x3f/0x60
[<c04e79e2>] __remove_mapping+0xb2/0xf0
[<c04e7cbb>] shrink_page_list+0x26b/0x490
[<c047f85d>] ? put_lock_stats+0xd/0x30
[<c083fd67>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x50
[<c0482566>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xb6/0x220
[<c04e8158>] shrink_inactive_list+0x278/0x620
[<c04729e1>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x121/0x180
[<c047e9b8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x18/0x130
[<c047eadb>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0x10
[<c0843438>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x8/0x90
[<c047f85d>] ? put_lock_stats+0xd/0x30
[<c04e8704>] shrink_zone+0x204/0x3c0
[<c083fcac>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2c/0x50
[<c04e951e>] kswapd+0x61e/0x7c0
[<c04e6ed0>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x1f0
[<c046bae0>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50
[<c04e8f00>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x7c0
[<c046b5e4>] kthread+0x74/0x80
[<c046b570>] ? kthread+0x0/0x80
[<c04035ba>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10
Reported-by: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6.34-rc5-mm1/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.34-rc5-mm1.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ linux-2.6.34-rc5-mm1/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -838,10 +838,12 @@ int task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struc
* enabled in "curr" and "curr" is a child of "mem" in *cgroup*
* hierarchy(even if use_hierarchy is disabled in "mem").
*/
+ rcu_read_lock();
if (mem->use_hierarchy)
ret = css_is_ancestor(&curr->css, &mem->css);
else
ret = (curr == mem);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
css_put(&curr->css);
return ret;
}
@@ -1360,9 +1362,13 @@ static int memcg_oom_wake_function(wait_
* Both of oom_wait_info->mem and wake_mem are stable under us.
* Then we can use css_is_ancestor without taking care of RCU.
*/
+ rcu_read_lock();
if (!css_is_ancestor(&oom_wait_info->mem->css, &wake_mem->css) &&
- !css_is_ancestor(&wake_mem->css, &oom_wait_info->mem->css))
+ !css_is_ancestor(&wake_mem->css, &oom_wait_info->mem->css)) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
wakeup:
return autoremove_wake_function(wait, mode, sync, arg);
@@ -2401,7 +2407,9 @@ mem_cgroup_uncharge_swapcache(struct pag
/* record memcg information */
if (do_swap_account && swapout && memcg) {
+ rcu_read_lock();
swap_cgroup_record(ent, css_id(&memcg->css));
+ rcu_read_unlock();
mem_cgroup_get(memcg);
}
if (swapout && memcg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists