[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1004241258140.3739@i5.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 13:01:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] Preparation for BKL'ed ioctl removal
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> The CONFIG_BKL stuff is not a requirement for doing this, but something
> we /also/ want to do in the next merge window, i.e. mark all BKL users
> as CONFIG_BKL, not just the ones that use the locked_ioctl (or bkl_ioctl).
.. and I think that's simply fundamentally wrong. What does it buy us,
except for another really annoying config option? It sure as hell doesn't
buy us any code-size (what, a couple of bytes).
Quite frankly, if you want to just prepare to rename things one by one,
then you might as well just have a single line
#define bkl_ioctl ioctl
and then you can do
.bkl_ioctl = driver_ioctl
but the thing is - what does that _buy_ us without the ability to grep for
and cause compile errors for drivers that haven't done this? Nothing.
So seriously - I'd _much_ rather just get one single large patch that just
renames everything. None of this crap that makes no sense.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists