[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100424110200.b491ec5f.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:02:00 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"minchan.kim@...il.com" <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][mm][PATCH] fix migration race in rmap_walk
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:58:01 +0100
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie> wrote:
> > I had considered this idea as well as it is vaguely similar to how zones get
> > resized with a seqlock. I was hoping that the existing locking on anon_vma
> > would be usable by backing off until uncontended but maybe not so lets
> > check out this approach.
> >
>
> A possible combination of the two approaches is as follows. It uses the
> anon_vma lock mostly except where the anon_vma differs between the page
> and the VMAs being walked in which case it uses the seq counter. I've
> had it running a few hours now without problems but I'll leave it
> running at least 24 hours.
>
ok, I'll try this, too.
> ==== CUT HERE ====
> mm,migration: Prevent rmap_walk_[anon|ksm] seeing the wrong VMA information by protecting against vma_adjust with a combination of locks and seq counter
>
> vma_adjust() is updating anon VMA information without any locks taken.
> In constract, file-backed mappings use the i_mmap_lock. This lack of
> locking can result in races with page migration. During rmap_walk(),
> vma_address() can return -EFAULT for an address that will soon be valid.
> This leaves a dangling migration PTE behind which can later cause a
> BUG_ON to trigger when the page is faulted in.
>
> With the recent anon_vma changes, there is no single anon_vma->lock that
> can be taken that is safe for rmap_walk() to guard against changes by
> vma_adjust(). Instead, a lock can be taken on one VMA while changes
> happen to another.
>
> What this patch does is protect against updates with a combination of
> locks and seq counters. First, the vma->anon_vma lock is taken by
> vma_adjust() and the sequence counter starts. The lock is released and
> the sequence ended when the VMA updates are complete.
>
> The lock serialses rmap_walk_anon when the page and VMA share the same
> anon_vma. Where the anon_vmas do not match, the seq counter is checked.
> If a change is noticed, rmap_walk_anon drops its locks and starts again
> from scratch as the VMA list may have changed. The dangling migration
> PTE bug was not triggered after several hours of stress testing with
> this patch applied.
>
> [kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com: Use of a seq counter]
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
I think this patch is nice!
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists