lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 24 Apr 2010 04:04:11 +0100
From:	Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
To:	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
Cc:	Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, simon.kagstrom@...insight.net,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, rth@...ddle.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MTD: Fix Orion NAND driver compilation with ARM OABI

Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > > Any one of these should fix it:
> > > 
> > >    - Make io_base a pointer-to-volatile-u64 or cast it in the asm, and
> > >      make sure to dereference it and use an "m" constraint (or
> > >      tighter, such as "Q", if ldrd needs it).  It must be u64, not
> > >      pointer-to-void, to tell GCC the size.  That tells GCC which memory
> > >      the asm accesses, and the volatile dereference should tell GCC
> > >      not to reorder them in principle (but the GCC manual doesn't
> > >      make a specific promise about this for asms).
> > 
> > The LDRD has special range constraints on its addressing mode which is 
> > not expressable with any of the available gcc memory constraints.
> 
>     'Q'
>           A memory reference where the exact address is in a single
>           register (''m'' is preferable for 'asm' statements)
> 
> If 'r' is good enough for io_base, 'Q' should be good enough for *io_base.

And if that doesn't work, it's possible to pass both the pointer, and
the dereference, as separate input operands, and only use the pointer
in the asm template.  GCC will still treat the dereference input as a
dependency.

-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ