| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <x2sd6200be21004232154i4738d938vf57ade1b702cf404@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:54:29 -0700 From: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com> To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> Cc: linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] PM: suspend_block: Add debugfs file 2010/4/23 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>: > On 04/23/10 20:23, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote: >> 2010/4/23 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>: >>> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:08:54 -0700 Arve Hjønnevåg wrote: >>> >>>> Report active and inactive suspend blockers in >>>> /sys/kernel/debug/suspend_blockers. >>> >>> >>> This looks more like user interface information than it does debug information. >>> If that's correct, it shouldn't be in debugfs. >> >> Where should it be? It is not allowed in sysfs, and procfs does not >> appear to be open to new files. > > Why is it not allowed in sysfs? due to more than one value per file Yes. > or something else? > > I don't think that procfs is closed to new files, but you may have to > justify why it should be used. > I used procfs in the original version and there were a lot of objections to this, so I moved it to debugfs. -- Arve Hjønnevåg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists