linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/9] PM: suspend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:53:01 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC:	Arve Hj?nnev?g <arve@...roid.com>,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] PM: suspend_block: Add debugfs file

On 04/25/10 11:15, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:58:53PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:08:54 -0700 Arve Hj?nnev?g wrote:
>>
>>> Report active and inactive suspend blockers in
>>> /sys/kernel/debug/suspend_blockers.
>>
>>
>> This looks more like user interface information than it does debug information.
>> If that's correct, it shouldn't be in debugfs.
> 
> It's debug-like information, and has more than one value per file, so
> debugfs seems like the proper place for it.  I have no objection to it
> going there.

I have no objection if it really is debug info, but I'm not convinced
of that yet.

-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/